Banker/Arcanist Control - TheSpoils

Go Back   TheSpoils > The Spoils™ Deck Building > The Spoils™ Competitive Deck Building
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2006, 01:47 PM
Omega_Goo's Avatar
Omega_Goo Omega_Goo is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 46
Default Banker/Arcanist Control

NOTE: UPDATED BUILD LOWER IN PAGE



Here's my deck, but... it's got a few extraneous cards.

Resources
Obsession x2
Greed x16

Locations
Banker
Gold Summit x2


Items
Banker
Brummagem Jewelry x3
Free Trade Agreement x2
Index of Natural Forces x2
Magic Vault x1


Characters
Arcanist
Servile Centipede x2

Banker
Blanching Butcher x2
Concealed Goon x2
Erotic Assassin x4
Ghostly Auditor x2
Mau Tough x1
Pettifogger x2
Repo Man x1
Skilled Negotiator x4
Tax Attorney x2


Tactics
Arcanist
12 Man Brunch of Doom x3
Forget x2
Remember x2
Quotidian Assassination x4

Banker
Cash Out x1
Downsizing x2
Irresistible Bribe x4
Limited Liability x4
Postmortem Debenture x2
Selective Gluttony x1




I'm going to run more Servile Centipedes, but should I run more Selective Gluttonys, Cash Outs, or both? Finally, Should I try for some Samual Gristwallers?
__________________
If I were to think, the world would explode.

*Head explodes*

Now what could that mean?

Last edited by Omega_Goo : 12-21-2006 at 07:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2006, 06:34 PM
LucienofShadow's Avatar
LucienofShadow LucienofShadow is offline
Mod Squad & The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge; Ambassador
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,584
Default

Try to get more arcanist in there, because right now it looks like the deck would be better without it.
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2006, 12:12 AM
redstarbaron's Avatar
redstarbaron redstarbaron is offline
The Spoils™ Ambassador
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 264
Default

If you really want to run a control deck, you probably want at least a few Lugubrious Finger Traps and Quotidian Ejectors. If anything, drop the Quotidian Assassinations in favor of the Ejectors. Ejectors give you a 1/1/3 and can bounce any non-resource card for not much more cost than the Assassination. Also, I would tone down the Limited Liability in favor of stuff that gives you more permanent lockdown, since Liability is a stalling tactic at best. Maybe try Arcanist Almanac or, yeah, Samuel Gristwalter. And seriously, how can you run Gold Summits (which seem a little out of place in this deck, frankly) without Beatrix Winterbottom? If nothing else, Beatrix is a great "control" card because (in my experience) your opponent will get distracted and do everything they can to kill her, which means they're not focusing on your other characters. And if they don't, then hell, load up your hand and go to town.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2006, 02:45 PM
Omega_Goo's Avatar
Omega_Goo Omega_Goo is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 46
Default Changed the deck

Okay, It's a little more focused now. I got some new cards, too.

Resources
Obsession x2
Greed x15

Items
Arcanist
Ambiguity Inhibitor x2
Lugubrious Finger Trap x4

Banker
Brummagem Jewelry x4
Magic Vault x2


Characters
Arcanist
Servile Centipede x4
Quotidian Ejector x2

Banker
Beatrix Winterbottom x2
Concealed Goon x2
Erotic Assassin x4
Pettifogger x2
Skilled Negotiator x4
Samual Gristwalter x2
Tax Attorney x2


Tactics
Arcanist
12 Man Brunch of Doom x4
Forget x2
Remember x2

Banker
Cash Out x2
Irresistible Bribe x4
Limited Liability x4
Postmortem Debenture x4


The deck works quite nicely, but I know of 4 cards I need to add. Problem is, I'm really bad at deciding what to take out.

What should I take out for 2 more Ejectors and Forgets?

Thank you for your time!

Edit: Small update and thank you!
__________________
If I were to think, the world would explode.

*Head explodes*

Now what could that mean?

Last edited by Omega_Goo : 12-21-2006 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2006, 05:04 PM
Osion Osion is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 465
Default

4 ofs are definitely a must if you can get the cards.

Repo man may not be worth it depending on your metagame; the only locations I've seen played at all are The Ministry of Other Smaller Ministries, Dragon's Quarters, and Gold Summit. playing a 5-cost 3/3/3 is bad if you can't destroy a location.

Cash Out is superior at triple greed threshold. Selective Gluttony looks great on paper but does little realistically other than sift through a bunch of cards and leaves you open to Catastrophic Betrayal.
__________________
255 STE
Strike
The Greater of Two Evils
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2006, 05:41 PM
Kallen000's Avatar
Kallen000 Kallen000 is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Selective Gluttony looks great on paper but does little realistically other than sift through a bunch of cards and leaves you open to Catastrophic Betrayal.

or you could say I have 5 cards in hand gold summit is out so I gain 10 life and keep 6 of 15 cards and that means I will have 6 answers in my hand to whats in front of me. Should I or he play 4? Not at all. should you play 1 or 2? Sure!

1) Winterbottoms are only good if you have great board controll. If the situation is dicy they are just a waste. They only draw you one card any time you would draw. Not 1 card per card drawn.

2) Well its really up to you if you want to keep repo man. I am of the philosphy to play with the magic sideboard equivelent in my deck. If I dont need the card it goes facedown. I say its not the only answer you could play as forget is an excellent card especially for control decks like this and it can take out locations.

3) just so you know with postmortem debarture, remember, shocking reapperance, necromancer tech at your disposal selective gluttony look a lot better especially since no one is playing adroit maurader really. No real need to worry about cat betrayel in this deck as you dont have huge phatties to be scared of and with arcanist you are playing bounce you could just bounce it to your hand and say thank you.

I like the deck has potential in its current state it has no real goal except to get concealed goon out and bring the pain through that which isnt bad at all i just would be cautous in a tournament since you wont really have a creature advantage that often so you might run into draws.

Last edited by Kallen000 : 12-12-2006 at 05:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-21-2006, 07:28 PM
Omega_Goo's Avatar
Omega_Goo Omega_Goo is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 46
Default Update

Did some playtesting. I know I need to add some cards, but I don't know what to take out! (See the decklist above)
__________________
If I were to think, the world would explode.

*Head explodes*

Now what could that mean?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:19 AM
Bandit Bandit is offline
The Spoils™ Level 1 Judge
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega_Goo
Did some playtesting. I know I need to add some cards, but I don't know what to take out! (See the decklist above)

Magic Vault goes. Beyond that, it's tough to say.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Arcane Tinmen ApS