View Full Version : seed is better?
08-23-2009, 01:58 PM
is it only me or does seed provide a much more rich variety of good versile cards than the other two sets?
at least with commons that is. Rares will always be rares and most likely crazy and good.
but after buying a display pack of Part 2 boosters and getting about as many good commons as from buying 2-3 seed boosters I started thinking
08-23-2009, 10:56 PM
in my opinion SEED has the better rares while part 1 and 2 have the better commons and uncommons.
09-07-2009, 11:48 PM
i agree. (DING!DING!DING!) circle gets the square.
MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIJUANA (http://michigan.dispensaries.org/)
09-11-2009, 12:48 AM
Depends on what faction you are talking about. I don't think Rogue got many things in seed. The powerhouse cards (Pluck, Heist Planner, Rapine, Martial Artists..) were in the earlier set. The other factions got some awesome stuff (mostly warlord though). Overall, it's hard to tell, since Seed brought some new mechanics. I started playing in seed and most of my cards are seed. I am missing a lot of cards to build any kind of rogue deck. Warlord got some staples in Seed like Gideon and Adrial. Gearsmith got some amazing Golems. Banker became quite powerful with karmic cake and dual resources. Arcanists became masters of recurring tactics. I think Rogue's best card from seed is Lucky Charm (Well Muddle bugs... but I have a dislike for that card).
09-11-2009, 08:33 AM
Heist Training Grounds (at 5 look through the deck every turn is good and give a dude covert at 3 is really good)
Pant Swipe (flipup turn 3 seems really good)
i will admit that they didnt get any BOMB rare chrarcters but the above are all good or above that comeuppance is really good eot to wipe the field.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.