View Full Version : What would you play?
davyinatoga
12-16-2007, 12:53 PM
Here's a list of cards I got yesterday for sealed. I know I did horribly. I'm curious to know how other players would play this set to see what I did wrong. Then after a bit I'll tell what I took and why I think it was bad.
Reality Shift (foil)
Intellectual Reliquary
Stupidify
Thabbashite Haruspex
Day of the Tentacle
Sequestered Hellion
Abominable Hamster
Unimportant Wizard8
Foul Diviner
Thabbashite Wizard
Fiendesh Fez
Theocratic Senate of Marduun (foil)
Currency Bazaar
Because God Says So
Flabbergasting Philosopher
Extravagant Contusion x3
Scintillating Chamber Pot
Inconvenient Roadblock
Prostitution Lobbyist
Karmic Cake
Fiscal Intercessor
Founttain iver
Workshop
Essence of Elitism
Rune of Concealment
Jocular Stupefaction
Multi-Attachment Man
Velocious Golem
313373 M3ch4n1c
Terra Cotta Flagellator
Mundane Pupil x2
Surprising Nuisance
Runic Reinforcement x2
B14nd P3pp3r
Titillating Contortionist
Essence of Deception
Swollen Ostrich
Flailing Knife
Casino King x2
Flimflam Man
Obtuse Pipesmoker
Affectionate Dollkeeper
Strangulate
Rumply Ruse
Roulette Wheel of DOOM! x2
Hidden Dagger
Godwing Thunderhoof
Violence
Proficient Battler
Spitting Sarume
Virtuous Razer
Mass Confusion
Nimble Conscript
Vigilant Raider
Frenzied Shriever x2
Tiny Sarume
Robustical Badass
Enduring Swordman
J Caster
12-16-2007, 02:53 PM
yellow blue
Fishman
12-16-2007, 03:01 PM
yellow blue
Definitely. I'd also run Deception for the Strangulate and 2xWheel of Doom, along with some decent cheaper dudes. Can't decide offhand which resources to start.
J Caster
12-16-2007, 03:08 PM
Start one Greed one Elitism
// Lands
1 [STP] Elitism (3)
7 [STP] Rage (3)
7 [STP] Greed (3)
1 [SCL] Violence
// Creatures
1 [SCL] Enduring Swordsman
1 [SCL] Nimble Conscript
1 [SCL] Vigilant Raider
2 [SCL] Frenzied Shriever
1 [SCL] Tiny Sarume
1 [SCL] Robustical Badass
1 [SCL] Virtuous Razer
1 [SCL] Multi-Attachment Man
1 [SCL] Prostitution Lobbyist
1 [SCL] Flabbergasting Philosopher
1 [SCL] Spitting Sarume
1 [SCL] Fiscal Intercessor
1 [SCL] Fountain Diver
1 [SCL] Godwing Thunderhoof
1 [SCL] Proficient Battler
// Spells
1 [SCL] Mass Confusion
1 [SCL] B14nd P3pp3r
2 [SCL] Runic Reinforcement
1 [SCL] Theocratic Senate of Marduun
1 [SCL] The Currency Bazaar
1 [SCL] Because God Said So!
3 [SCL] Extravagant Contusion
1 [SCL] Scintillating Chamber Pot
1 [SCL] Inconvenient Roadblock
1 [SCL] Karmic Cake
Killercoz
12-16-2007, 03:51 PM
Start 1 greed 1 elitism 6 deception 5 greed
Theocratic Senate of Marduun (foil)
Currency Bazaar
Because God Says So
Flabbergasting Philosopher
Extravagant Contusion x3
Scintillating Chamber Pot
Inconvenient Roadblock
Karmic Cake
Fiscal Intercessor
Fountain Diver
Multi-Attachment Man
Velocious Golem
313373 M3ch4n1c
Surprising Nuisance
Runic Reinforcement x2
B14nd P3pp3r
Titillating Contortionist
Essence of Deception
Swollen Ostrich
Flailing Knife
Casino King x2
Flimflam Man
Obtuse Pipesmoker
Affectionate Dollkeeper
Strangulate
Roulette Wheel of DOOM! x2
Hidden Dagger
I don't understand why everyone plays rage in seed sealed even when it isn't the best choice(Not in this pool in general). You can't play rage because it's rage.
woxn1234
01-01-2008, 06:04 PM
Start Tourny Faction/Warlord/Gearsmith
Start: 1 Rage, 1 Elitism
Greed x7
Deceptionx7
Currency Bazaar
Because God Says So
Flabbergasting Philosopher
Extravagant Contusion x3
Scintillating Chamber Pot
Karmic Cake
Multi-Attachment Man
Velocious Golem
Surprising Nuisance
Runic Reinforcement x2
Essence of Deception
Swollen Ostrich
Titillating Contortionist
Casino Kingpin x2
Flimflam Man
Affectionate Dollkeeper
Strangulate
Rumply Ruse
Roulette Wheel of DOOM! x2
Proficient Battler
Spitting Sarume
Virtuous Razer
Nimble Conscript
Robustical Badass
I know that this build takes away the option of turn 0 Karmic Cake, but I believe it smooths out the lower curve of the deck much better. The more solid characters you have in the deck the better, and this pool is lacking in solid characters.
davyinatoga
01-03-2008, 10:26 AM
Well, seeing that the general consensus is banker with 2 other trades that aren't arcanist puts me at ease.
Start Tourney Faction, 1 Greed, 1 Rage.
10 Deception
6 Greed
1 Violence
Fiscal Intercessor
Fountain Diver
Prostitution Lobbyist
Affectionate Dollkeeper
Titllating Contortionist
Enduring Swordsman
Frenzied Shriever x2
Proficient Battler
Robustical Badass
Spitting Sarume
Tiny Sarume
Virtuous Razer
The Currency Bazaar
Extravagant Contusion x3
Inconvenient Roadblock
Karmic Cake
Scintillating Chamber Pot
Essence of Deception
Hidden Dagger
Roulette Wheel of DOOM! x2
Rumply Ruse
Strangulate
So how this deck came about:
First off, I pulled the foils. They're not always worth it to me to play them, and I wasn't happy with the two that I got. After looking at my pool, I knew I definitely wanted greed. 3x Contusions plus tons of 2-thresh? Duh! So I pulled those out, expecting to start 2 greed. Looking at the others, I took Rogues for the few 4-speeds (Casino Kingpin wasn't worth the 7 cost imho) plus removal, and couldn't decide Gearsmith or Warlords. The Violence was the breaker for that decision (mistake #1 - later I figured that Gearsmith would've been better, since it wouldn't have left me with so many more options (meaning less opportunities for bad choices)). I went sorting, and noticed that there were only 2 Warlord cards that utilized 3+ thresh: the Badass and Godwing. Badass was optional, so I tossed the Godwing (mistake #2 - might as well have gone all-out rage with him) and all 2 thresh Warlords(mistake #3 - Confusion and Raider I could do without, but 2 Nimble conscripts... dipstick). I decided that splashing a Rage and using the violence only for the Badass's icons matter effect (which was worth it at the time) would work (mistake #4 - weakened my Bankers too much). I only saw the Violence once, and I mulliganned it. Anyway, from there I just thinned out the weaklings. And the deck went 0-3-0. Good job, me. The failure was maybe ~35% bad luck (since there was plenty of it), ~25% poor playing (damn Chamber Pot keeps screwing my head around), ~40% bad deckbuilding. Hey, at least I didn't use Arcanist.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.