PDA

View Full Version : i need another question answered



dragon1575
09-24-2006, 10:13 PM
if u have an item equipped to an opponents character and the character is bounced the item goes to the opponents hand right?

ill prolly post some more of his so please stay.

- :spade: roxem:spade:

painted_klown
09-24-2006, 10:17 PM
When any card is bounced, it will "bounce" back to the original player of the card.

ripark
09-25-2006, 03:22 PM
if u have an item equipped to an opponents character and the character is bounced the item goes to the opponents hand right?

ill prolly post some more of his so please stay.

- :spade: roxem:spade:

To make an assist here:

The item will leave play in the same way the character leaves play. So, if the character is bounced, then the item is bounced as well (but to its owner's hand, like mentioned before).

Biggin
09-25-2006, 04:51 PM
From which part of the rules do you guys get that a piece of attached gear gets bounced back to its owner's hand? My understanding was that the gear follows the attached card, and I can't find anything on the rules sheet that indicates differently.

doc8466
09-26-2006, 04:29 AM
You're right Biggin. Any attached card follows the card it's attached to. So if my character is bounced back to my hand, so is the gear attached to it. If the gear was played by my opponent, it'd go back to his hand.

ripark
09-26-2006, 11:07 AM
I made my ruling on the subject based on the rule specifically:


If something causes a card to leave play, any cards attached to it leave play in the same way. (This includes being destroyed, removed from the game, put into its owner's hand, or shuffled into it's owner's deck)

Since all bounce effects that we have seen (I believe) state specifically "put into its owner's hand" any attached cards would also leave play in that manner, i.e. put into its owner's hand. If the rule didn't work that way, then destroyed characters with attachments would have the attachments go into their controller's discard pile, rather than the owner's discard pile.

NearbySerpent
09-26-2006, 12:37 PM
I made my ruling on the subject based on the rule specifically:



Since all bounce effects that we have seen (I believe) state specifically "put into its owner's hand" any attached cards would also leave play in that manner, i.e. put into its owner's hand. If the rule didn't work that way, then destroyed characters with attachments would have the attachments go into their controller's discard pile, rather than the owner's discard pile.
This is correct. If card A is returned to it's owner's hand and card B is attached to card A, card B will also be returned to its owner's hand.

Dapuma
09-26-2006, 02:47 PM
I would have thought the item on the character that was bounced would go into the graveyard...that isnt the case?

ripark
09-26-2006, 02:51 PM
Nope. Attached cards leave play in the same manner as the card that had the attachments. So if a character is removed from play, the attached cards are removed from play. If the character is destroyed, the attached cards are destroyed and so on.