View Full Version : Banker Tactic--Shucking Fits
moonfolk
07-18-2012, 07:31 PM
Shucking Fits
4[G][G]
Banker Tactic
Cost: Choose a number for X that is less than or equal to the number of [G] you control. Choose X characters.
Effect: Deplete the chosen characters. They cannot be restored by their faction's RESTORE ABILITY on their controller's next turn. Draw a card.
Flip up: 4[G][G].
“Shuck, you! More pearls!”
__________________________________________________ _______________________________________________
I imagine a picture of a fat mau barking commands at a bunch of skinny, homeless mau next to a HUGE pile of oyster shells. Tell me if this fits the Faction...
ImInneren
07-19-2012, 08:37 AM
Think you mean pick X characters.
So new:
COST: Pick X or fewer characters, where X is the number of [G] you control.
But it is interesting that you give the tactic a minimum of [G][G] ;D
For that, I think, a little bit strong^^
If you use this in your turn, they´re depletet 2 turns from you!
And cannot do anything...
Do you think, this is weak? xD
moonfolk
07-19-2012, 06:37 PM
How much do you think the threshold should be, [G][G][G] or more? 4? I would also want the card to be playable... How about if it cost 5? 6?
Shucking Fits
5[G][G][G]
Banker Tactic
COST: Pick X or fewer characters, where X is the number of [G] you control.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked characters. They cannot be restored by their faction's RESTORE ABILITY on their controller's next turn. Draw a card.
ImInneren
07-20-2012, 10:12 AM
No, the starting [G] dosen´t matter. Because, you only deplete so many characters you have Greeds. So if the tactic only have one G Tresh, and only have one Greed, you only can deplete one.^^
The interesting thing is, that you have a minimun G to use this card :D
Look at Cryptic Athaneum or other such cards, they only have one Tresh, but for special-effects you need more Tresh^^
The strong thing is, if you use this tactic in YOUR turn, your opponent can´t use his characters for TWO!!!! Rounds you may attack him! ^^
For example: I have 2 Erotic Assassin and 2 Dwarvish Grimalkin.
The Opponent have 3 other characters.
I play the tactic and deplete all.
Attack, make 8 damage.
Opponents turn, he can´t restore.
My turn, I restore and attack, 8 damage.
(He can´t do anything except with strong other abilitys)
You understand? ^^
moonfolk
07-22-2012, 09:08 AM
Maybe then, it would be more fair to have it cost 6. Here's the update:
Shucking Fits
6[G]
Banker Tactic
COST: Pick X or fewer characters, where X is the number of [G] you control.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked characters. Those cards cannot be restored by their faction's RESTORE ABILITY on their controller's next turn.
Recur: [G][G][G][G]
COST: Use this only if this card is in your discard pile. Pay 2. Remove this card from the game. Pick a character.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked character. That card cannot be restored by their faction's RESTORE ABILITY on their controller's next turn.
ImInneren
07-22-2012, 02:11 PM
Have an idea (i like your ideas, have so many ideas through you, and you have GOOD ideas!!!)
Shucking Fits
4[G]
Banker Tactic
COST: Pick X or fewer characters, where X is the number of [G] you control.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked characters. At the start of your opponents next turn, your opponent may pay 1 for each character depleted by this card. If he don´t, the character cannot be restored by that player´s factions RESTORE RULE.
Recur: [G][G][G][G]
COST: Use this only if this card is in your discard pile. Pay 3. Remove this card from the game. Pick a character.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked character. That card cannot be restored by their faction's RESTORE ABILITY on their controller's next turn.
(The second I think is ok not to pay 1, it can be used against only one character and only one time with recur)
moonfolk
07-22-2012, 07:12 PM
Thanks for the compliments! I like giving Bankers cards that have conditional "payment" options, where your opponent can pay X to prevent something or allow something to happen. Ministry of Smaller Ministries is a good example.
I like your version. It would still be really great, but not too good. This card was hard for me to judge... I like yours.
ImInneren
07-23-2012, 03:25 PM
Really, you have so many great ideas, I am fascinated about it.
I always think about new cards, but I am a person, I find never "a beginning"...^^
You understand xD
Sigorion
07-27-2012, 10:06 AM
I really like this card. Down to the core concept. Like the latest incarnation best though. Just change RESTORE ABILITY to RESTORE RULE.
Otherwise you could opt to:
0(G)
COST: Choose a number for X that is equal or lower than he number of (G) you control. Pay X+X. Pick X characters.
EFFECT: Deplete the picked characters. They cannot be restored by that player´s factions RESTORE RULE next turn.
moonfolk
07-30-2012, 08:58 PM
Now that I like! It makes it more fair too, but without the option to pay one to allow them to be restored. I think that's a great idea.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.